INDICATIONS AND USAGE
- With suspected metastasis who are candidates for initial definitive therapy
- With suspected recurrence based on elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level
Performance
PSMA imaging is guideline supported across the many stages of prostate cancer
Guidelines underscore a substantial need
Prostate cancer is diagnosed in nearly 314,000 men annually and represents the second-leading cause of cancer death among men in the United States.1
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) do not recommend conventional imaging as a prerequisite to PSMA PET.2
Recommendations of guidelines on PSMA PET/CT or PET/MRI2-4
See the challenge of under-utilization +

PSMA PET scans are under-utilized among US veterans and other high-risk populations
Despite evidence-based recommendations, ≈1/3 of men in the Veterans Health Administration with newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer (Gleason scores 8-10 and PSA >20 ng/mL) are not receiving PSMA PET2,5
In a study of disparities in imaging, black patients were found to receive nearly 4 times fewer 68Ga-PSMA-11a PET scans than non-Hispanic white patients6

PSMA PET provides accurate imaging critical for clinical decision-making
The standard of care for advanced prostate cancer imaging7
PSMA PET is increasingly replacing conventional imaging for many phases of prostate cancer because it provides more accurate information.3

Learn more about high-risk patients +
Imaging modality performance in the proPSMA study conducted in high-risk prostate cancer patients8,b
(metastases)
(metastases)
PSMA PET/CT often changes patient management
In a meta-analysis of 54 studies, PSMA PET/CT led to changes in clinical management in9:


Start strong with accurate initial staging
Performance—initial staging/diagnosis

Reliable diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11a for detecting pelvic lymph node metastases10
See the performance data +

Patient-level performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 for detection of pelvic lymph node metastasis (n=123)d


Gozellix scans provide information critical to patient management12


Gozellix enables accurate detection of micrometastases as small as 2 mm for more informed clinical decision-making at the earliest signs across a broad range of prostate cancer13,14
68Ga-PSMA-11 has been used in more than 220,000 patients15
Performance—biochemical recurrence
Reliable, accurate results for patients with recurrent prostate cancer

CLR by serum PSA level

Detection rates of distant metastases increased with PSA levels17
- High true positive rates in regional and distant metastases, including bone18
- 91% true positive rate10
See how accuracy matters +
Gozellix demonstrated high accuracy in recurrent prostate cancer detection (N=2005)17

Detection in patients with PSA levels as low as 0.02 ng/mL18


Take a closer look at 68Ga-PSMA-11a

PSMA PET tracers exhibit differential biodistribution that can impact interpretation and clinical decision-making20
- Gozellix has the longest time to dose expiration of any 68Ga-based PET agent that incorporates cyclotron-based Ga-6810
68Ga-PSMA-11 had a lower rate of unspecific bone uptake than those scanned with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET21,22
Interpreting benign lesions as metastatic may have far-reaching implications for patients.23
Understand the difference +
Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) procedure guidelines and studies suggest interpreting bone lesions with 18F-based PSMA radiotracers could have significant implications due to detection of benign bone lesions.3,22-24

68Ga has high interobserver agreement7
Detection in patients with PSA levels as low as 0.02 ng/mL18
- 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT has high reproducibility and higher interobserver agreement than 18F-based scans7,25
68Ga has low interobserver variability25

Gozellix has an injection window of more than 3X that of 18F-based tracers at standard dose27

You’re always looped in
INDICATIONS AND USAGE
- With suspected metastasis who are candidates for initial definitive therapy
- With suspected recurrence based on elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS
Image interpretation errors can occur with GOZELLIX PET. A negative image does not rule out the presence of prostate cancer, and a positive image does not confirm the presence of prostate cancer. Gallium Ga-68 gozetotide uptake is not specific for prostate cancer and may occur with other types of cancer as well as non-malignant processes such as Paget’s disease, fibrous dysplasia, and osteophytosis. Clinical correlation, which may include histopathological evaluation of the suspected prostate cancer site, is recommended.
Gallium Ga-68 gozetotide contributes to a patient’s overall long-term cumulative radiation exposure. Long-term cumulative radiation exposure is associated with an increased risk for cancer. Ensure safe handling to minimize radiation exposure to the patient and healthcare providers. Advise patients to hydrate before and after administration and to void frequently after administration.
Ascorbic Acid Stabilizer contains sodium metabisulfite, a sulfite that may cause allergic-type reactions including anaphylactic symptoms and life-threatening or less severe asthmatic episodes in certain susceptible people. The overall prevalence of sulfite sensitivity in the general population is unknown and probably low. Sulfite sensitivity is seen more frequently in asthmatic than in non-asthmatic people.
ADVERSE REACTIONS
DRUG INTERACTIONS
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and other therapies targeting the androgen pathway, such as androgen receptor antagonists, can result in changes in uptake of gallium Ga-68 gozetotide in prostate cancer. The effect of these therapies on performance of gallium Ga-68 gozetotide PET has not been established.
Please see the Full Prescribing Information.
References: 1. Prostate cancer facts and statistics. ZERO Prostate Cancer. Accessed February 10, 2025. https://zerocancer.org/about-prostate-cancer/facts-statistics. 2. Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Prostate Cancer V.2.2025. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2025. All rights reserved. Accessed April 16, 2025. To view the most recent and complete version of the guideline, go online to NCCN.org. NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way. 3. Fendler WP, Eiber M, Beheshti M, et al. PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM procedure guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for prostate cancer imaging 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50(5):1466-1486. 4. Lowrance W, Dreicer R, Jarrard DF, et al. Updates to advanced prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline (2023). J Urol. 2023;209(6):1082-1090. 5. Miller SR, Gonzalez RT, Jackson WC, et al. Rates of PSMA PET staging and positivity in newly diagnosed prostate cancer in a national health care system. J Nucl Med. 2025;66(1):75-83. 6. Bucknor MD, Lichtensztajn DY, Lin TK, Borno HT, Gomez SL, Hope TA. Disparities in pet imaging for prostate cancer at a tertiary academic medical center. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(5):695-699. 7. Bundschuh RA, Lütje S, Bundschuh L, et al. High interobserver agreement on PSMA PET/CT even in the absence of clinical data. Clin Nucl Med. 2023;48(3):207-212. 8. Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, et al; proPSMA Study Group Collaborators. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multi-centre study. Lancet. 2020;395(10231):1208-1216. 9. Jeet V, Parkinson B, Song R, Sharma R, Hoyle M. Histopathologically validated diagnostic accuracy of PSMA-PET/CT in the primary and secondary staging of prostate cancer and the impact of PSMA-PET/CT on clinical management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Nucl Med. 2023;53(5):706-718. 10. Gozellix (kit for the preparation of gallium Ga 68 gozetotide injection) prescribing information. 11. Data on File. 68-GA Imaging. Telix Pharmaceuticals. 2025. 12. Sonni I, Eiber M, Fendler WP, et al. Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on staging and management of prostate cancer patients in various clinical settings: a prospective single-center study. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(8):1153-1160. 13. Giesel FL, Fiedler H, Stefanova M, et al. PSMA PET/CT with Glu-urea-Lys-(Ahx)-[68Ga(HBED-CC)] versus 3D CT volumetric lymph node assessment in recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(12):1794-1800. 14. Alipour R, Azad A, Hofman MS. Guiding management of therapy in prostate cancer: time to switch from conventional imaging to PSMA PET? Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019;11:1758835919876828. 15. Data on File. Internal Telix Sales. Telix Pharmaceuticals. 2025. 16. Müller J, Ferraro DA, Muehlematter UJ, et al. Clinical impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET on patient management and outcome, including all patients referred for an increase in PSA level during the first year after its clinical introduction. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(4):889-900. 17. Abghari-Gerst M, Armstrong WR, Nguyen K, et al. A comprehensive assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: results from a prospective multicenter study on 2,005 patients. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(4):567-572. 18. Burgard C, Hoffmann MA, Frei M, et al. Detection efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer with very low PSA levels: a 7-year, two-center “real-world” experience. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(5):1376. 19. Seifert R, Telli T, Opitz M, et al. Unspecific 18F-PSMA-1007 bone uptake evaluated through PSMA-11 PET, bone scanning, and MRI triple validation in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2023;64(5):738-743. 20. Heilinger J, Roth KS, Weis H, et al. Do you know your PSMA-tracer? Variability in the biodistribution of different PSMA ligands and its potential impact on defining PSMA-positivity prior to PSMA-targeted therapy. EJNMMI Res. 2025;15(1):4. 21. Kuchar M, Mamat C. Methods to increase the metabolic stability of 18F-radiotracers. Molecules. 2015;20(9):16186-16220. 22. Rauscher I, Krönke M, König M, et al. Matched-pair comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT: frequency of pitfalls and detection efficacy in biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(1):51-57. 23. Phelps TE, Harmon SA, Mena E, et al. Predicting outcomes of indeterminate bone lesions on 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT scans in the setting of high-risk primary or recurrent prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2023;64(3):395-401. 24. Kroenke M, Mirzoyan L, Horn T, et al. Matched-pair comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT in patients with primary and biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: frequency of non–tumor-related uptake and tumor positivity. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(8):1082-1088. 25. Hagens MJ, Oprea-Lager DE, Vis AN, et al. Reproducibility of PSMA PET/CT imaging for primary staging of treatment-naïve prostate cancer patients depends on the applied radiotracer: a retrospective study. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(10):1531-1536. 26. Uprimny C, Bayerschmidt S, Kroiss AS, et al. Impact of forced diuresis with furosemide and hydration on the halo artefact and intensity of tracer accumulation in the urinary bladder and kidneys on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT in the evaluation of prostate cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(1):123-133. 27. Data on File. Isotope Decay Rates. Telix Pharmaceuticals. 2022.